Page 206 - FINAL-book ประมวลกฎหมาย เกี่ยวกับการจัดซื้อจัดจ้างและการบริหารพัสดุ(แก้ไขครั้งที่15)

Page 19
Volume 134 Special Part 210 D Government Gazette August 23, 2017

(2) Inspecting of mutual benefits and documents for price tenders and samples of
supplies (if any) or considering all the presentations of all the tenderers or documents that are
required to submit after the price tendering day under Clause 44 and selecting tenderers that
does not have mutual benefits and submits complete and correct documents with
qualifications and technical proposal or supplies meeting the requirements according to the
conditions prescribed in the notifications and documents for the electronic price tenders.

In this proceeding, the committee may inquire into additional fact from any
tenderer, but shall not let any tenderer change the essential contents already posted. If the
committee sees that qualifications of any tenderer do not meet the requirements stated in the
conditions that the State agency has determined in the notifications and documents for
electronic price tenders, it prescribes that the committee shall remove the names of such
tenderers from the price tenders.

In the case where any tenderer incompletely provides technical documents or
specification of supplies for procurement, or provides details that are different from the
conditions determined by the State agency in the notifications and documents for electronic
price tenders, in the part that is not material and the differences do not have any advantage to
other tenderers or is just a slight mistake, the remove of right shall be compromised.

(3) Consider selecting supplies or qualifications of the tenderer that correctly in
line with (2) and consider for selection of the quotation under the criteria prescribed in the
announcement and documents for electronic price tenders. Not more than 3 tenderers
proposed the lowest prices, or the highest scores shall be ranked.

In the case where the selected tenderer does not settle into contract or
agreement with the State agency within the time specified in the documents for the electronic
price tenders, the Committee shall consider the tenderer proposing the second lowest price or
the tenderer obtaining the second highest total scores, as the case may be;

(4) Providing reports of consideration results and opinions altogether with all the
accepted documents and proposing to the head of the State agency through the head officer to
consider for approval. In this regard, the report of the consideration results shall consist of, at
least, the followings:

(a) List of supplies to be procured;
(b) Names of the tenderer, quoted prices and proposals of all tenderers;
(c) Names of the tenderers that do not have mutual benefits with others;
(d) Selection criteria of proposal and scoring standards;

(e) Result of the selection, suggestions and scoring for proposal of all the
tenderers, altogether with the supportive reasons for the consideration.

206