Page 231 - FINAL-book ประมวลกฎหมาย เกี่ยวกับการจัดซื้อจัดจ้างและการบริหารพัสดุ(แก้ไขครั้งที่15)

Page 44
Volume 134 Special Part 210 D Government Gazette August 23, 2017

(3) specific method;
(4) design competition method.

General Solicitation Notification Method

Clause 145. The provisions under Clause 109, Clause 110, Clause 111, Clause 112,
and Clause 113 shall be applied on the design or construction supervision work by the
general solicitation notification method in this part mutatis mutandis.

Clause 146. When it comes to the expiration of the opening of proposal envelopes,
the committee in charge of the design or construction supervision work by the general
solicitation notification method shall carry out the following acts:
(1) open the proposal envelopes and review the documents submitted by all
providers and the committee members shall affix their signatures on every page thereof;
(2) review mutual benefits among the tenderers and documents submitted by the
providers and select the providers who do not have mutual benefits with other providers with
complete, accurate documents and qualifications and proposal that are in line with the
conditions specified by the State agency in the solicitation documents.

In the consideration process, the committee may inquire additional facts from any
provider, but cannot ask them to amend a material part proposed. If the committee sees that
any provider does not possess complete qualifications according to the conditions specified
by the State agency in the solicitation documents, the committee shall remove the name of
such provider from the selection.
In the case where any provider incompletely submits documents under the quality
criteria or the details submitted are different from the conditions specified by the State
agency in the notifications or documents for design or construction supervision work,
provided that they are not key substances and such differences do not cause any disadvantage
to other providers or are minor mistakes, such provider may not be considered to suspend the
right for tendering proposals and can be proceeded for the next consideration process;
(3) consider for selection of proposals tendered by providers that are in line with
(2) of which the qualities and qualifications are beneficial to the State agency. The
procurement shall be proposed to not more than three providers possessing the highest quality

scores and are made in order of the scores.
In the case where the selected provider obtaining the highest quality scores does not
settle into contract with the State agency within the time specified in the documents for
design or construction supervision work, the committee shall consider the provider obtaining
the second highest quality scores;
(4) provide report of consideration results by applying the provisions under
Clause 114 (4) mutatis mutandis.

231